Tuesday, February 15, 2011

OIG Finds Significant Problems With EPA Brownfields AAI Reviews

Feb 14: The U.S. EPA Office of Inspector General (OIG) issued a report entitled, EPA Must Implement Controls to Ensure Proper Investigations Are Conducted at Brownfields Sites (No. 11-P-0107, February 14, 2011). OIG conducted the review to evaluate how EPA is ensuring that Brownfields Assessment grantees adhere to "all appropriate inquiries" (AAI) requirements. Grantees awarded EPA Brownfields Assessment grants must meet AAI requirements. AAI is the process of evaluating a property for potential environmental contamination and assessing potential liability for contamination. To ensure a proper investigation, grantees must conduct AAI in compliance with Federal regulations put into effect by EPA on November 1, 2006, and issue a report on findings.
 
    OIG found that EPA does not review AAI reports submitted by grantees to assure that they comply with Federal requirements. Rather, EPA has relied on the environmental professional conducting the AAI to self-certify that requirements are met. OIG said, "Of the 35 AAI reports we reviewed, from three EPA regions, none contained all the required documentation elements. This occurred because the Agency does not have management controls requiring EPA project officers to conduct oversight of AAI reports. Management controls regarding EPA oversight of Brownfields grants funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) are also missing. EPA has issued specific guidance and management controls for ARRA grant activities. However, the guidance and controls do not address oversight of AAI reports. "
 
    OIG indicated that because of EPA's lack of oversight and reliance on environmental professionals' self-certifications, AAI investigations not meeting Federal requirements may go undetected by Agency staff. OIG found instances of noncompliance that were not detected by Agency staff. Improper AAI investigations introduce risk that the environmental conditions of a property have not been properly or adequately assessed, which may lead to improper decisions about appropriate uses of brownfields properties. Ultimately, threats to human health and the environment could go unrecognized. Noncompliant AAI investigations may result in future grant denials and possible government reimbursement. The AAI reports the OIG reviewed were generated from $2.14 million in grant awards. If conditions merit, EPA is authorized to take back funds from noncompliant grantees. OIG said it "questions the value of the reports we reviewed."
 
    OIG recommended that "EPA establish accountability for compliant AAI reports, to include those conducted under ARRA Brownfields grants; develop a plan to review AAI reports to determine the reports' compliance with AAI documentation requirements; and establish criteria to determine whether noncompliant grantees should return Federal grant money." OIG said the Agency did not clearly agree or disagree with OIG recommendations. In its final response to the report, the Agency needs to agree or disagree with recommendations and, as appropriate, provide a corrective action plan to address the recommendations.
 
    OIG conducted the review in EPA headquarters, Regions 1 and 5, and two U.S. territories located in EPA Region 2 (Puerto Rico) and Region 9 (Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, or CNMI). OIG selected Regions 1 and 5 because of the high dollar value of grants awarded to these regions from fiscal years 2002 through 2008.
 
    Access the complete OIG report (click here).
 
THE REST OF TODAY'S NEWS
- House Hearing On Environmental Regulations, Economy, & Jobs
- Shell Report "Signals & Signposts" On Energy & Environmental Issues
- Comparison Of Defendant Briefs In AEP v. Connecticut
- UN Program To Assess Agriculture GHG Emissions
- House Hearing On Improving Highway Project Efficiency
- Senate Hearing On Green Jobs & Trade
- Circle Of Blue Begins 12-Part Series "Choke Point: China" 
- First New York State Fracking Contamination Lawsuit